Voici les tableau d'Anandtech sur
le celeron P4
Internet
Content Creation Performance
Internet Content Creation SYSMark 2002 |
Intel
Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

AMD Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

|
|
|
233

230

208

195

193

135

128

108

|
|
|
0 |
|
47 |
|
93 |
|
140 |
|
186 |
|
233 |
|
280 |
|
|
|
En internet, il s'en tire bien.
General
Usage Performance
Office Productivity SYSMark 2002 |
Intel
Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

AMD Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

|
|
|
137

132

125

124

110

106

104

91

|
|
|
0 |
|
27 |
|
55 |
|
82 |
|
110 |
|
137 |
|
164 |
|
|
|
En bureautique aussi
MP3
Encoding Performance
Lame MP3 Encoder 3.91 -v -V 0
Time in Minutes to Encode 170MB .wav File |
Intel
Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

AMD Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

|
|
|
1.98

2.10

2.30

2.45

2.50

2.55

2.55

2.57

|
|
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
En MP3 mieux vaut l'overclocker, de comparable au duron il
passe meilleur
3D
Rendering Performance
3D Studio MAX 4.2.6 Waterfall.max
(Rendered Images per Hour - Higher is better) |
AMD
Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

|
|
|
44.4

42.9

39.1

37.5

34.0

33.3

30.3

25.9

|
|
|
0 |
|
9 |
|
18 |
|
27 |
|
36 |
|
44 |
|
53 |
|
|
|
.En CAO 3D il est le plus mauvais
3D
Rendering Performance
Maya 4.0.1 Rendertest
(Rendered Images per Hour - Higher is better) |
AMD
Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

|
|
|
34.6

31.6

31.3

27.9

27.3

25.2

25.0

22.4

|
|
|
0 |
|
7 |
|
14 |
|
21 |
|
28 |
|
35 |
|
42 |
|
|
|
.Pas terrible
3D
Rendering Performance using SSE2
Lightwave 7.5 (Raytrace Benchmark)
(Image Render Time in Seconds) |
Intel
Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

AMD Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium III 1.2

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

|
|
|
170.9

189.8

209.2

242.8

248.2

248.8

253.6

294.3

|
|
|
0 |
|
59 |
|
118 |
|
177 |
|
235 |
|
294 |
|
353 |
|
|
|
.Même avec les optimisations du P4
Next-Generation
3D Gaming Performance
Unreal Performance Test 2002 Build 918 - 1024 x 768 x 32 |
AMD
Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

|
|
|
42.4

36.6

34.1

33.4

32.1

30.6

27.7

26.2

|
|
|
0 |
|
8 |
|
17 |
|
25 |
|
34 |
|
42 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
.Mauvais pour les jeux new look
3D
Gaming Performance
Jedi Knight 2 - High Quality - 1024x768x32 |
AMD
Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

|
|
|
92.5

81.7

76.8

75.9

69.1

65.4

63.3

48.8

|
|
|
0 |
|
19 |
|
37 |
|
56 |
|
74 |
|
93 |
|
111 |
|
|
|
.Pas mal pour les jeux anciens
3D
Gaming Performance
Comanche 4 - High Quality - 1024x768x32 |
AMD
Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Intel Pentium III 1.2

AMD Duron 1.3GHz

Intel Celeron 1.2GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7 @ 2.26GHz

Intel Celeron 1.7GHz

|
|
|
36.4

33.8

30.2

30.1

28.2

26.5

24.7

20.8

|
|
|
0 |
|
7 |
|
15 |
|
22 |
|
29 |
|
36 |
|
44 |
|
|
|
Pas terrible sur ce dernier jeu sortit
|